id |
ijac201816203 |
authors |
Anderson, Carl; Carlo Bailey, Andrew Heumann and Daniel Davis |
year |
2018 |
title |
Augmented space planning: Using procedural generation to automate desk layouts |
source |
International Journal of Architectural Computing vol. 16 - no. 2, 164-177 |
summary |
We developed a suite of procedural algorithms for space planning in commercial offices. These algorithms were benchmarked against 13,000 actual offices designed by human architects. The algorithm performed as well as an architect on 77% of offices, and achieved a higher capacity in an additional 6%, all while following a set of space standards. If the algorithm used the space standards the same way as an architect (a more relaxed interpretation), the algorithm achieved a 97% match rate, which means that the algorithm completed this design task as well as a designer and in a shorter time. The benchmarking of a layout algorithm against thousands of existing designs is a novel contribution of this article, and we argue that it might be a first step toward a more comprehensive method to automate parts of the office layout process. |
keywords |
Office design, design augmentation, space planning, automation, office layout, desk layouts |
series |
journal |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf ( bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Bailey C., Phelan N., Cosgrove A. et al. (2017)
This room is too dark and the shape is too long: quantifying architectural design to predict successful spaces
, de Rycke K, Gengnagel C, Baverel O, et al. (eds) Humanizing digital reality . Singapore: Springer, pp. 337–348
|
|
|
|
Buffa E.S., Armour G.C. and Vollman T.E. (1964)
Allocating facilities with CRAFT
, Harvard Bus Rev; 42(2): 136–159
|
|
|
|
Calixto V. and Celani G. (2015)
A literature review for space planning optimization using an evolutionary approach: 1992– 2014
, SIGRADI 2015: proceedings of the 19th conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics , Florianópolis, 23–27 November 2015, pp. 662–671, vol. 2. Linköping: Linköping University Electronic Press
|
|
|
|
Cross N. (1977)
The automated architect
, London: Pion Ltd
|
|
|
|
Flemming U. and Woodbury R. (1995)
Software Environment to Support Early Phases in Building Design (SEED): Overview
, Journal of Architectural Engineering; 1(4): 147–152
|
|
|
|
Frey C. and Osborne M. (2017)
The future of employment: how susceptible are jobs to computerisation
, Technol Forecast Soc; 114: 254–280
|
|
|
|
Gero J.S. (1994)
Towards a model of exploration in computer-aided design
, Gero JS and Tyugu E (eds) Formal design methods for CAD . Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 315–336
|
|
|
|
Homayouni H. (2000)
A survey of computational approaches to space layout planning (1965–2000)
, Seattle, WA: Department of Architecture and Urban Planning, University of Washington
|
|
|
|
Keough I. and Benjamin D. (2010)
Multi-objective optimization in architectural design
, Proceedings of the 2010 Spring Sim Multiconference, Orlando, FL, 11–15 April 2010, pp. 1–8. New York: ACM
|
|
|
|
Liggett R.S. (2000)
Automated facilities layout: past, present and future
, Automat Constr; 9(2): 197–215
|
|
|
|
Manyika J., Chui M., Miremadi M. et al. (2017)
A future that works: automation, employment, and productivity
, New York: McKinsey Global Institute
|
|
|
|
Mitchel W. (1990)
The logic of architecture
, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2019/08/07 14:03 |
|