| id |
ijac202018302 |
| authors |
Brath Jensen, Mads; Isak Worre Foged and Hans Jørgen Andersen |
| year |
2020 |
| title |
A framework for interactive human–robot design exploration |
| source |
International Journal of Architectural Computing vol. 18 - no. 3, 235-253 |
| summary |
This study seeks to identify key aspects for increased integration of interactive robotics within the creative design process. Through its character as foundational research, the study aims to contribute to the advancement of new explorative design methods to support architects in their exploration of fabrication and assembly of an integrated performance-driven architecture. The article describes and investigates a proposed design framework for supporting an interactive human–robot design process. The proposed framework is examined through a 3-week architectural studio, with university master students exploring the design of a brick construction with the support of an interactive robotic platform. Evaluation of the proposed framework was done by triangulation of the authors’ qualitative user observations, quantitative logging of the students’ individual design processes, and through questionnaires completed after finishing the studies. The result suggests that interactive human–robot fabrication is a relevant mode of design with positive effect on the process of creative design exploration. |
| keywords |
Design methods, robotic design processes, interactive robotics, computational design, design exploration, creativity |
| series |
other |
| type |
normal paper |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf ( bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Dorst K and Cross N. (2001)
 Creativity in the design process: co-evolution of problem–solution
, Des Stud; 22(5): 425–437
|
|
|
|
|
Dubor A, Camprodom G, Diaz GB, et al. (2016)
Sensors and workflow evolutions: developing a framework for instant robotic toolpath revision
, Reinhardt D, Saunders R and Burry J (eds) Robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design 2016. Cham: Springer, pp. 410–425
|
|
|
|
|
Dörfler K, Rist F and Rust R. (2012)
Interlacing—an experimental approach to integrating digital and physical design methods
, Brell-Co̧kcan S and Braumann J (eds) Robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design 2012. Cham: Springer, pp. 82–91
|
|
|
|
|
Flick U. (2009)
An introduction to qualitative research
, 4th ed. London: SAGE, p. 504
|
|
|
|
|
Gramazio F and Kohler M. (2008)
Digital materiality in architecture
, Zürich: Lars Müller Publishers, p. 112
|
|
|
|
|
Groat L and Wang D. (2013)
Systems of inquiry and standards of research quality
, Groat LN and Wang D (eds) Architectural research methods. 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 63–100
|
|
|
|
|
Hill J. (2011)
Design research–the first five hundred years
, Beim A and Thomsen MR (eds) The role of material evi-dence in architectural research. Copenhagen: The Royal Danish Academy of Fine Arts, pp. 14–27
|
|
|
|
|
Johns RL, Kilian A and Foley N. (2014)
Design approaches through augmented materiality and embodied computation
, McGee W and Ponce de Leon M (eds) Robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design 2014. Cham: Springer, pp. 319–332
|
|
|
|
|
Lawson B. (2005)
How designers think—the design process demystified
, 4th ed. Oxford: Taylor & Francis
|
|
|
|
|
Schwartz T, Andraos S, Nelson J, et al. (2016)
Towards on-site collaborative robotics
, Reinhardt D, Saunders R and Burry J (eds) Robotic fabrication in architecture, art and design 2016. Cham: Springer, pp. 388–397
|
|
|
|
|
Schön DA. (1983)
The reflective practitioner—how professionals think in action
, 1st ed. New York: Basic Books
|
|
|
|
|
Songel JM. (2008)
A conversation with Frei Otto
, Barcelona: Princeton Architectural Press
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2020/11/02 13:39 |
|
