id |
ijac202018407 |
authors |
Marcelo Bernal, Victor Okhoya, Tyrone Marshall, Cheney Chen and John Haymaker |
year |
2020 |
title |
Integrating expertise and parametric analysis for a data-driven decision-making practice |
source |
International Journal of Architectural Computing vol. 18 - no. 4, 424–440 |
summary |
This study explores the integration of expert design intuition and parametric data analysis. While traditional professional design expertise helps to rapidly frame relevant aspects of the design problem and produce viable solutions, it has limitations in addressing multi-criteria design problems with conflicting objectives. On the other hand, parametric analysis, in combination with data analysis methods, helps to construct and analyze large design spaces of potential design solutions and tradeoffs, within a given frame. We explore a process whereby expert design teams propose a design using their current intuitive and analytical methods. That design is then further optimized using parametric analysis. This study specifically explores the specification of geometric and material properties of building envelopes for two typically conflicting objectives: daylight quality and energy consumption. We compare performance of the design after initial professional design exploration, and after parametric analysis, showing consistently significant performance improvement after the second process. The study explores synergies between intuitive and systematic design approaches, demonstrating how alignment can help expert teams efficiently and significantly improve project performance. |
keywords |
Performance analysis, parametric analysis, design space, design expertise, data analysis, optimization |
series |
journal |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf ( bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Abdulmawla A, Schneider S, Bielik M, et al. (2018)
Integrated data analysis for parametric design environment-mineR: a grasshopper plugin based on R
, Proceedings of the 36th eCAADe conference (eds Kepczynska-Walczak A and Bialkowski S), Lodz, 17–21 September 2018, pp. 319–326. Lodz: Lodz University of Technology
|
|
|
|
Bernal M, Haymaker JR and Eastman C. (2015)
On the role of computational support for designers in action
, Des Stud; 41: 163–182
|
|
|
|
Breiman L. (2001)
Random forests
, Mach Learn; 45: 5–32
|
|
|
|
Brown NC and Mueller CT. (2019)
Design variable analysis and generation for performance-based parametric modeling in architecture
, Int J Archit Comput; 17: 36–52
|
|
|
|
Chlela F, Husaunndee A, Inard C, et al. (2009)
A new methodology for the design of low energy buildings
, Energ Build; 41: 982–990
|
|
|
|
Clevenger CM and Haymaker J. (2011)
Metrics to assess design guidance
, Des Stud; 32: 431–456
|
|
|
|
Dabbeeru MM and Mukerjee A. (2008)
Discovering implicit constraints in design
, Gero J and Goel A (eds) Design computing and cognition’08. BerlSpringer, pp. 201–220
|
|
|
|
Dhariwal J and Banerjee R. (2017)
An approach for building design optimization using design of experiments
, Build Simul; 10: 323–336
|
|
|
|
Dombrowski U and Wagner T. (2014)
Mental strain as field of action in the 4th industrial revolution
, Proc Cirp; 17: 100–105
|
|
|
|
Dorst K. (2004)
On the problem of design problems-problem solving and design expertise
, J Des Res; 4: 185–196
|
|
|
|
Dreyfus HL. (1997)
Intuitive, deliberative, and calculative models of expert performance
, Zsambok CE and Klein G (eds) Naturalistic decision making. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis, pp. 17–28
|
|
|
|
Erhan H, Wang IY and Shireen N. (2015)
Harnessing design space: a similarity-based exploration method for generative design
, Int J Archit Comput; 13: 217–236
|
|
|
|
Geyer P and Schlüter A. (2014)
Automated metamodel generation for design space exploration and decision-making: a novel method supporting performance-oriented building design and retrofitting
, Appl Energ; 119: 537–556
|
|
|
|
Grobman YJ, Yezioro A and Capeluto IG. (2010)
Non-linear architectural design process
, Int J Archit Comput; 8: 41–53
|
|
|
|
Hamby D. (1994)
A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models
, Environ Monit Assess; 32: 135–154
|
|
|
|
Haymaker J, Bernal M, Marshall MT, et al. (2018)
Design space construction: a framework to support collaborative, parametric decision making
, J Inform Tech Construct; 23: 157–178
|
|
|
|
Kruger C and Cross N. (2006)
Solution driven versus problem driven design: strategies and outcomes
, Des Stud; 27: 527–548
|
|
|
|
Lawson B. (2004)
Schemata, gambits and precedent: some factors in design expertise
, Des Stud; 25: 443–457
|
|
|
|
Maher ML, Poon J and Boulanger S. (1996)
Formalising design exploration as co-evolution
, Gero J and Sudweeks F (eds) Advances in formal design methods for CAD. BerlSpringer, pp. 3–30
|
|
|
|
Maltais L-G and Gosselin L. (2017)
Daylighting ‘energy and comfort’performance in office buildings: sensitivity analysis, metamodel and Pareto front
, J Build Eng; 14: 61–72
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2021/06/03 23:29 |
|