id |
ijac202220306 |
authors |
Duclos-Prévet, Claire; François Guéna; Mariano Efron |
year |
2022 |
title |
Constraint handling methods for a generative envelope design using genetic algorithms: The case of a highly constrained problem |
source |
International Journal of Architectural Computing 2022, Vol. 20 - no. 3, pp. 587–609 |
summary |
The use of genetic algorithms as generative and performance design techniques often involves, in practice, constraint handling, which can be a complex task. Moreover, environmental simulations are computationally expensive and managing constraints can avoid wasting time on infeasible solutions. Despite these two incentives, and the benefits of an immense literature, both applied and theorical, on constrained optimization, there are only few guidelines and tools directly applicable by architects to address this issue. This paper proposes to fill this gap by identifying, classifying, and implementing different constraint management techniques available to architects. Seven methods have been tested for a highly constrained envelope design problem, consisting in the optimization of a sun-shading system. Three of them are easily replicable to different types of projects while the four others need to find a problem-specific heuristic. It appears that the second category is more efficient but implies the use of generative techniques that are more difficult to implement than parametric models |
keywords |
Optimization under constraint, performative envelope design, generative and sustainable design, agent-based modeling, multiobjective genetic algorithm, visual comfort |
series |
journal |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Attia S (2011)
State of the art of existing early design simulation tools for net zero energy buildings: a comparison of ten tools
, Architecture et climat 2011.
|
|
|
|
Avison DE, Lau F, Myers MD, et al (1999)
Action research
, Commun ACM 1999; 42(1): 94–97.
|
|
|
|
Bechthold M, King J, Kane A, et al (2018)
Integrated environmental design and robotic fabrication workflow for ceramic shading systems
, Proceedings of the 28th ISARC, Seoul, Korea International Association for Automation and Robotics in Construction, 2011, pp 70–75.
|
|
|
|
Bernal M, Okhoya V, Marshall T, et al (2020)
Integrating expertise and parametric analysis for a data-driven decisionmaking practice
, Int J Architectural Comput 2020; 18(4): 424–440.
|
|
|
|
Bertsekas DP (1982)
Constrained Optimization and Lagrange Multiplier Methods
, New York, NY: New York Academic Press, 1982
|
|
|
|
Caetano I, Santos L and Leitao A (2020)
Computational design in architecture: defining parametric, generative, and algorithmic design
, Front Architectural Res 2020; 9(2): 287–300.
|
|
|
|
Caldas L (2008)
Generation of energy-efficient architecture solutions applying GENE_ARCH: an evolution-based generative design system
, Adv Eng Inform 2008; 22(1): 59–70.
|
|
|
|
Carlucci S, Causone F, De Rosa F, et al (2015)
A review of indices for assessing visual comfort with a view to their use in optimization processes to support building integrated design
, Renew Sustainable Energy Reviews 2015; 47: 1016–1033
|
|
|
|
Chatzikonstantinou I, Turrin M, Cubukcuoglu C, et al (2019)
A comprehensive optimization approach for modular facades: the case of PULSE sunshading
, Int J Des Sci Tech 2019; 23(2): 159–185.
|
|
|
|
Cichocka JM, Browne WN and Rodriguez E (2017)
Optimization in the architectural practice
, Int Conf Computer-Aided Architectural Des Res Asia: Protoc Flows Glitches 2017; 22: 387–396.
|
|
|
|
Coello CA (2002)
Theoretical and numerical constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms: a survey of the state of the art
, Computer Methods Applied Mechanics Engineering 2002; 191(11–12): 1245–1287.
|
|
|
|
Coello CA (2016)
Constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms
, Proc 2016 Genet Evol Comput Conf Companion 2016: 563–587.
|
|
|
|
Costa-Carrapiço I, Raslan R and Gonzalez JN (2020)
A systematic review of genetic algorithm-based multi-objective ´ optimisation for building retrofitting strategies towards energy efficiency
, Energy and Buildings 2020; 210: 109690.
|
|
|
|
Deb K, Pratap A, Agarwal S, et al (2002)
A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II
, IEEE Transactions Evolutionary Computation 2002; 6(2): 182–197.
|
|
|
|
Deb K (2000)
An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms
, Computer Methods Applied Mechanics Engineering 2000; 186(2–4): 311–338. 608 International Journal of Architectural Computing 20(3)
|
|
|
|
E Nault, Rey E and Andersen M (2016)
A multi-criteria decision-support work ´ flow for early-stage neighborhood design based on predicted solar performance
, Proceedings of PLEA 2016 32nd international Conference on Passive and Low Energy Architecture
|
|
|
|
Eltaweel A and Yuehong SU (2017)
Parametric design and daylighting: a literature review
, Renew Sust Energ Rev 2017; 73:1086–1103. Duclos-Prevet et al ´ 607
|
|
|
|
Ercan B and Elias-Ozkan ST (2012)
Performance-based parametric design explorations: a method for generating appropriate building components
, Des Stud 2015; 38: 33–53.
|
|
|
|
Fathy F and Fareed HA (2015)
Performance-driven Façade design using an evolutionary multi-objective optimization approach
, International Conference for Sustainable Design of the Built Environment-SDBE London, UK, 20-21 December 2017, p 217.
|
|
|
|
Gerber DJ, Pantazis E and Wang A (2017)
A multi-agent approach for performance based architecture: design exploring geometry, user, and environmental agencies in façades
, Automation in Construction 2017; 76: 45–58.
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2024/04/17 14:30 |
|