| id |
sigradi2006_k002 |
| authors |
Kvan, Thomas |
| year |
2006 |
| title |
Creative Collaborations |
| source |
SIGraDi 2006 - [Proceedings of the 10th Iberoamerican Congress of Digital Graphics] Santiago de Chile - Chile 21-23 November 2006, pp. 27-29 |
| summary |
The teaching of design is typically an individual process. Theories of learning, imperatives of assessmentand traditional teaching models set individual tasks that are intendedto lead to individual submissions. With attitudes of training and instruction, the focus is typically on skill acquisition and demonstration of such skills through successful completion of project tasks.The context of studio teaching, however, is one that is immensely powerful and makes a substantial contribution to the intellectual approaches to comprehending our realities and, more importantly, our futures. In this paper I will focus on three aspects of studio that warrant attention, among the many that demand it, especially as digital media and environments, beyond tools, are pervasive in design. This paper will consider the importance of studio education as the context for design education from the aspects of design as asocial act, design as an expert act, design as an engagement of data. |
| series |
SIGRADI |
| type |
keynote paper |
| email |
|
| full text |
 file.pdf (205,069 bytes) |
| references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Anthony, K. H. (1991)
 Design juries on trial: the renaissance of the design studio
, New York, Van Nostrand Reinhold
|
|
|
|
|
Boyer, E. L. and L. D. Mitgang (1996)
Building community: a new future for architecture education and practice: a special report
, Princeton, N.J., Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching
|
|
|
|
|
Bucciarelli, L. L. (2002)
Between thought and object in engineering design
, Design Studies 23(3): 219-231
|
|
|
|
|
Churchman, C. W. (1967)
Wicked problems
, Management Science 14(4): B141-B142
|
|
|
|
|
Eraut, M. (1994)
Developing professional knowledge and competence
, London ; Washington, D.C., Falmer Press
|
|
|
|
|
Kvan , T. and E. Kvan (1999)
Is design really social
, International Journal of Virtual Reality 4(1)
|
|
|
|
|
Kvan, T., J. T. H. Wong, et al. (2000)
Supporting Structural Activities in Design: A Multiple-Case Study
, Proceedings, Hong Kong, Hong Kong Polytechnic University
|
|
|
|
|
Kvan, T. (2000)
Collaborative design: what is it?
, Automation in Construction 9(4): 409-415
|
|
|
|
|
Lawson, B. (1980)
How designers think
, London, Architectural Press
|
|
|
|
|
Lawson, B. (1993)
Parallel Lines of Thought
, Languages of Design 1(4): 357-366
|
|
|
|
|
Little, P. and M. Cardenas (2001)
Use of “studio” methods in the introductory engineering design curriculum
, Journal of Engineering Education 90(3): 309
|
|
|
|
|
Minsky, M. (1977)
Frame-system theory
, Cognitive Science. P. N. Johnson-Laird and P. C. Wason. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
|
|
|
|
|
Schön, D. A. and G. Wiggins (1992)
Kinds of seeing and their functions in designing
, Design Studies 13(2): 135-156
|
|
|
|
|
Schön, D. A. and M. Rein (1994)
Frame reflection: toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies
, New York, BasicBooks
|
|
|
|
|
Schön, D. A. (1984)
Problems, frames and perspectives on designing
, Design Studies 5(3): 132-136
|
|
|
|
|
Schön, D. A. (1992)
Designing as reflective conversation with the materials of a design situation
, Research in Engineering Design 3(3): 131-148
|
|
|
|
|
Stumpf, S. C. and J. T. McDonnell (2002)
Talking about team framing: using argumentation to analyse and support experiential learning in early design episodes
, Design Studies 23(1): 5-23
|
|
|
|
|
Vera, A., T. Kvan, et al. (1998)
Expertise and collaborative design
, CHI’98 Conference Proceedings, Los Angeles, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM)
|
|
|
|
| last changed |
2016/03/10 09:54 |
|
