id |
sigradi2020_267 |
authors |
Soares, Juliana Maria Moreira; Campos, Paulo Eduardo Fonseca de |
year |
2020 |
title |
Women and intersectionality: perspectives based on digital fabrication as a viable platform for assistive design |
source |
SIGraDi 2020 [Proceedings of the 24th Conference of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics - ISSN: 2318-6968] Online Conference 18 - 20 November 2020, pp. 267-274 |
summary |
This article aims to present analyzes and perceptions regarding the experience of a project developed under the following axes: women, disabilities and the development of Assistive Technology in spaces called Fablabs. The study is developed according to an exploratory approach, with a qualitative nature. This paper provides an introduction, an exploration of the experiments and the reflections over the performed activities. In the practical stages, among others, methods of an ethnographic nature and Design Research were used. The group of women, mothers of children with disabilities, variable in size during the practices (from two to five people), carried out activities to develop assistive technology products using digital manufacturing tools in a public laboratory of the Fablab Livre SP Network , in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. The reflections of this study go towards questions related to women's self- esteem in the face of processes of inclusion in the technological area. The multi-signification of the Fablab space and the need to expand the intersectional debate within these environments are also encounters provided by this research. |
keywords |
Women, isability, fablabs, assistive technology, digital fabrication |
series |
SIGraDi |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (568,834 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Buehler, E. et al.et al. (2015)
Sharing is caring: assistive technology designs on Thingiverse
, 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Proceedings... Seoul: Yonsei University, p. 525–534
|
|
|
|
Buehler, E.; Kane, S. K.; Hurst, A. (2014)
ABC and 3D: opportunities and obstacles to 3D printing in special education environments
, Proc. ASSETS’14, 2014, pp. 107–114
|
|
|
|
Dougherty, D. (2013)
The maker mindset
, HONEY,M.; KANTER, D. E. (Eds.), Design/Make/Play. New York, NY: Routledge
|
|
|
|
Faulkner, W. (2001)
The technology question in feminism: a view from feminist technology studies
, Women’s Studies International Forum, Vol. 24, No. 1, pp. 79–95
|
|
|
|
Gershenfeld, N. (2012)
How to Make Almost Anything: The Digital Fabrication Revolution
, Foreign Affairs, 91, n. 6, p. 43-57
|
|
|
|
Hurley, U. (2018)
The Embodiment of Pure Thought”? Digital Fabrication, Disability, and New Possibilities for Auto|Biography
, a/b: Auto/Biography Studies, 33:2, 285-300
|
|
|
|
Kintsch, A.; Depaula, R. (2002)
A framewok for the adoption of assistive technology
, Conference on Assistive Technologies, 5., 2002, Edinburgh. Proceedings... NewYork: ACM. 11 p
|
|
|
|
Lamb, M. E.; Billings, L. A. L. (1996)
Fathers of children with special needs
, M. E. Lamb. (Org.).The role of the father in child development.London: John Wiley & Sons.p. 179-190
|
|
|
|
Nemorin, S. (2016)
The Frustrations of Digital Fabrication: An Auto/Ethnographic Exploration of,“3D Making in School”
, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 27.4, 517–35. Springer
|
|
|
|
Pederson, C. C. (2016)
Situating Making in Contemporary Latin America Feminist Art
, Journal of Peer Produciton.Issue #8: Feminism and (un)hacking
|
|
|
|
Plant, S. (1995)
The Future Looms: Weaving Women and Cybernetics
, FEATHERSTONE, M.; BURROWS, R. (eds). Cyberspace/Cyberbodies/Cyberpunk. Cultures of Technological Embodiment.London: Sage Publications. p. 45-64
|
|
|
|
Wajcman, J. (2004)
Technofeminism
, Cambridge, UK: Polity
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2021/07/16 11:49 |
|