id |
sigradi2021_314 |
authors |
Theisen, Tanner and Emami, Niloufar |
year |
2021 |
title |
The Design and Fabrication of Variable Façade Panel Systems |
source |
Gomez, P and Braida, F (eds.), Designing Possibilities - Proceedings of the XXV International Conference of the Ibero-American Society of Digital Graphics (SIGraDi 2021), Online, 8 - 12 November 2021, pp. 1257–1268 |
summary |
This study explores how alternative molding methods can be utilized to construct a variety of prefabricated volumetric concrete panels for façades from a single digitally fabricated mold. First, precedents were studied and panel variability was classified into ornamental, geometric, or assembly categories. Then, a molding method was proposed that improves upon traditional processes. Traditionally, geometrically varied façade panels are realized through creating a single mold for every variant, which is inefficient and wasteful. The proposed method allows for reusability of a singular mold which can fabricate variated panels through utilizing interchangeable mold inserts. This proposal was tested on a small scale through creating rapid iterations of molds fabricated with Stereolithography (SLA) printing. Emerging big area additive manufacturing (BAAM) technology allows for the proposed methods to be utilized at the industrial scale where they can reduce the cost, labor, and time of fabricating varied concrete panels while also creating complex geometries. |
keywords |
precast panels, 3D printing mold, variability, custom repetitive manufacturing, facades |
series |
SIGraDi |
email |
|
full text |
file.pdf (807,684 bytes) |
references |
Content-type: text/plain
|
Li, F., She, L., & Wang, H. (2020)
Standardization and Diversification of Precast Concrete Facade Panel
, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 455, 012108. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/455/1/012108Love, L., Post, B., Roschli, A., Chesser, P., & Hun, D. E. (2019). Feasibility of Using BAAM for Mold Inserts for the Precast Concrete Industry. https://doi.org/10.2172/1606893Martins, P., Fonseca de Campos, P., Nunes, S., & Sousa, J. P. (2019). The Tectonics of Digitally Fabricated Concrete. A Case for Robotic Hot Wire Cutting. In RILEM Bookseries (pp. 311–322). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99519-9_29Naboni, R., & Breseghello, L. (2018). Fused Deposition Modelling Formworks for Complex Concrete Constructions. SIGraDi 2018, XXII Congress of the Iberoamerican Society of Digital Graphics, 166–173. https://doi.org/10.5151/sigradi2018-1648Nahmens, A., & Mullens, M. (2011). Lean Homebuilding: Lessons Learned from a Precast Concrete Panelizer. Journal of Architectural Engineering, 17(4), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)AE.1943-5568.0000037Pan, M., & Pan, W. (2019). Determinants of Adoption of Robotics in Precast Concrete Production for Buildings. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(5), 5019007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000706Portland Cement Association. (n.d.). Ultra-High Performance Concrete. Retrieved August 25, 2020, from https://www.cement.org/learn/concrete-technology/concrete-design-production/ultra-high-performance-concreteRockite Cement. (2017). Specifications: Rockite Cement. [Data set]. from https://www.sculpt.com/2017/Tech/MsdsTechSheets/TechSheets/TECH_SHEET_rockite.pdfStephens, S. (2013). Sheared and shirred, surfaces and solids: Thom Mayne and his firm, Morphosis, turn a corner for the Perot Museum of Nature and Science in Dallas. Architectural Record, 201(1), 78–85
|
|
|
|
Sutherland, J. (2001)
Introduction
, J. Sutherland, D. Humm, & M. Chrimes (Eds.), Historic Concrete: The Background to Appraisal (pp. 1–10). Thomas Telford
|
|
|
|
last changed |
2022/05/23 12:11 |
|